Discussion about this post

User's avatar
Tom's avatar

After reading your typically thoughtful and comprehensive summary of the last section of “The Reef”, I realized that I didn’t understand the novel’s plot as well as I thought I did, so I’m in the process of re-reading Book Five. In the meantime, there’s one comment in your summary that I’m inclined to quibble with. In the first paragraph following the first long excerpt from the novel, you describe George as having had “a passionate affair” with Sophy Viner. It seems to me that any passion ensuing from George and Sophy’s time together in Paris was solely on the young woman’s part. The next time George meets up with Sophy at Givré, three months have passed—I think—and George realizes he’s barely given Sophy a thought since he left her in Paris. Towards the end of the novel, Sophy goes to see Anna in Paris to explain what happened between her and George. I think Sophy is stating the truth when she tells Anna that she could tell George wasn’t in love with her and was always preoccupied with someone else for the few days they were together in Paris.

Expand full comment
Tom's avatar
Sep 21Edited

The main reason I wanted to re-read Book Five was because I totally missed the part of the story where it is suggested that Anna and George have a night of passion just at the end of Chapter 36. And the main reason I missed this particular episode was because I totally wasn’t expecting it. Anna is described as being so mistrustful of George and hesitant about having any sort of future with him that the idea that she might end up in bed with him seemed entirely out of the question to me. Perhaps another reason I didn’t clue in was because of the way Anna’s behaviour is described. We are shown her leaning away from George, then “closing her eyes for an instant, and then slowly opening them to the flood of light in his.”

“Flood of light”? I suppose it’s possible, but it doesn’t suggest anything passionate to me; rather, I thought of something creepy, like an intense, blank, pupil-less, zombie stare. Of course, because of the time in which she was writing, Edith Wharton would have had to be careful how she expressed herself if she wanted to let her readers understand what George and Anna were up to without saying so in so many words and incurring the wrath of the critics. Her readers in the nineteen-teens might well have picked up on what her intended meaning was better than I did.

Still, I find it difficult to think of Anna going to bed with George, and perhaps that’s why Wharton was so subtle in how she described the end of Chapter 36, so as to leave the door open to a more chaste interpretation of what goes on after Anna is blinded by the “flood of light” from George’s eyes. After all, this is the same woman who recoiled at the idea of going to the same restaurant or theatre in Paris where George and Sophy enjoyed themselves together, but we’re expected to believe she’d be willing to occupy the same place in bed last made warm by Sophy Viner lying next to George only a few months before?

If she did, you might expect to read of Anna’s feelings about having slept with George afterwards. Perhaps it altered her opinion about him as a potential husband. But nothing like that sort of thinking ever comes up in the novel. Anna seems so conventional in her morals—as she herself recognizes—that the idea of going to bed with George before marriage, even if he’d never met Sophy, just seems really implausible to me, even though Wharton hints that’s exactly what happened. Perhaps she intended to be ambiguous and offer her readers a “Choose Your Own Adventure!” type of plot.

Nevertheless, I did come across one other place in the novel that could be interpreted as George and Anna sharing a pinch of snuff together. It comes just at the beginning of Chapter 33 when Anna is alone on the train heading back to Givré. She then thinks of the evening before when both Owen and George had shown up at her apartment in Paris. When Owen left, she and George were left alone. Then this happens:

“He came nearer, and looked at her, and she went to him. [She went to him—that’s significant; it shows receptivity to George’s advance.] All her fears seemed to fall from her as he held her. It was a different feeling from any she had known before; confused and turbid, as if secret shames and rancours stirred in it, yet richer, deeper, more enslaving. [Are these the memories of Anna’s sexual encounters with her first husband Fraser? Maybe, yet it’s “a different feeling from any she had known before”. Is her body telling her that this time it’s the real thing?] She leaned her head back and shut her eyes beneath his kisses [not opening her eyes to see the “flood of light” from George’s]. She knew now that she could never give him up.”

Then we have an immediate cut back to the present with Anna alone on the train to Givré. I could easily accept the above episode as indicating a willingness on Anna’s part to surrender herself to George. But as I said, if that indeed is what happens, it seems to have remarkably little affect upon Anna. It’s almost as if she doesn’t feel any more passionate about George than George felt about Sophy, yet we know how doggedly Anna fights with her own doubts to salvage her chance of marriage with George. So I’m a little confused by Wharton’s characters, just as I might be by real-life human beings.

Expand full comment
3 more comments...

No posts